Discussion:
How did the USA get video of a spacecraft lifting off of the moon?
(too old to reply)
Rudy Gonzales
2024-11-02 09:26:28 UTC
Permalink
It's obvious someone is handling the camera on the moon's
surface because it is panning upwards in a jerky motion
following the spacecraft.

So who got left behind? What happened to them?
Carlos E. R.
2024-11-02 22:10:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Gonzales
It's obvious someone is handling the camera on the moon's
surface because it is panning upwards in a jerky motion
following the spacecraft.
So who got left behind? What happened to them?
ignorant.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
Gordon Freeman
2024-11-04 19:42:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Gonzales
It's obvious someone is handling the camera on the moon's
surface because it is panning upwards in a jerky motion
following the spacecraft.
So who got left behind? What happened to them?
There's always some schmuck on board - "Just stand over there and
film us as we take off..." Then they deny the guy was ever on board
in the first place. First men on the Moon ... Neil Armstrong, Buzz
Aldrin, Esteban Lopez ... Woah! - why does no-one ever mention
Lopez?

186282@ud0s4.net
2024-11-03 00:38:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Gonzales
It's obvious someone is handling the camera on the moon's
surface because it is panning upwards in a jerky motion
following the spacecraft.
So who got left behind? What happened to them?
Hope they left him enough beer :-)

Anyway, the jerk was because the lander rose very
quickly and the change in angle was kinda beyond
what the pan mechanism could cope with.

THESE days they'd just present an 'AI' video sim,
kinda putting that in really small letters :-)
chrisv
2024-11-03 00:59:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Post by Rudy Gonzales
It's obvious someone is handling the camera on the moon's
surface because it is panning upwards in a jerky motion
following the spacecraft.
So who got left behind? What happened to them?
Hope they left him enough beer :-)
Anyway, the jerk was because the lander rose very
quickly and the change in angle was kinda beyond
what the pan mechanism could cope with.
THESE days they'd just present an 'AI' video sim,
kinda putting that in really small letters :-)
You can't fix stupid.
--
"[What Micheal Dell said] negates every 'idiotic lie' cola losers have
ever drooled about Microsoft controlling OEMs." - DumFSck, lying
shamelessly
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-11-03 04:10:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by chrisv
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Post by Rudy Gonzales
It's obvious someone is handling the camera on the moon's
surface because it is panning upwards in a jerky motion
following the spacecraft.
So who got left behind? What happened to them?
Hope they left him enough beer :-)
Anyway, the jerk was because the lander rose very
quickly and the change in angle was kinda beyond
what the pan mechanism could cope with.
THESE days they'd just present an 'AI' video sim,
kinda putting that in really small letters :-)
You can't fix stupid.
Well ... the XYZ camera mount was early-gen and the
little stepper motors and targeting methods were
only JUST so capable. As best I'm aware they just
kinda GUESSED at where the camera should point and
when and the little gears whirred as fast as they
could keep up with the program. Herkey-jerkey was
inevitable.

But the Vast Konspiracy people will grasp at
ANY straw. Gives their lives meaning, thinking
they're finding the Real Truth :-)

Remember when they had SO much fun with reflections
in the multi-layer helmet face-plates ? Were SURE
they saw a Hollywood studio in there ...

I actually SAW Apollo-11 take off from fairly close
range. They didn't fake anything THAT big - it was
the real deal. Sounded like the sky was tearing
apart ......
Geoff
2024-11-03 22:06:12 UTC
Permalink
  But the Vast Konspiracy people will grasp at
  ANY straw. Gives their lives meaning, thinking
  they're finding the Real Truth  :-)
  Remember when they had SO much fun with reflections
  in the multi-layer helmet face-plates ? Were SURE
  they saw a Hollywood studio in there ...
  I actually SAW Apollo-11 take off from fairly close
  range. They didn't fake anything THAT big - it was
  the real deal. Sounded like the sky was tearing
  apart ......
And now Buzz Aldrin has endorsed Trump. Now there's a dilemma ....
--
geoff
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-11-03 23:15:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geoff
   But the Vast Konspiracy people will grasp at
   ANY straw. Gives their lives meaning, thinking
   they're finding the Real Truth  :-)
   Remember when they had SO much fun with reflections
   in the multi-layer helmet face-plates ? Were SURE
   they saw a Hollywood studio in there ...
   I actually SAW Apollo-11 take off from fairly close
   range. They didn't fake anything THAT big - it was
   the real deal. Sounded like the sky was tearing
   apart ......
And now Buzz Aldrin has endorsed Trump. Now there's a dilemma ....
I like him better already ! :-)
Bill W
2024-11-03 23:22:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geoff
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
But the Vast Konspiracy people will grasp at
ANY straw. Gives their lives meaning, thinking
they're finding the Real Truth :-)
Remember when they had SO much fun with reflections
in the multi-layer helmet face-plates ? Were SURE
they saw a Hollywood studio in there ...
I actually SAW Apollo-11 take off from fairly close
range. They didn't fake anything THAT big - it was
the real deal. Sounded like the sky was tearing
apart ......
And now Buzz Aldrin has endorsed Trump. Now there's a dilemma ....
I like him better already ! :-)
Me too.
Loading...