sobriquet
2024-12-23 16:57:00 UTC
Often when you search for images, you can find nice images that are
ruined by watermarks.
But it's kind of odd that in many cases you can just search for the
image to find versions without watermarks.
So somehow the logic doesn't seem to add up. If a stock agency sells an
image, someone who paid for it is entitled to use it on their site, but
that means they are sharing a version of the image effectively, which
renders any attempt to protect the image with watermarks kind of silly.
For instance, take this image:
Loading Image...
It looks like it's 'protected'. But with a little searching it's easy to
find 'unprotected' versions.
Like here:
Loading Image...
ruined by watermarks.
But it's kind of odd that in many cases you can just search for the
image to find versions without watermarks.
So somehow the logic doesn't seem to add up. If a stock agency sells an
image, someone who paid for it is entitled to use it on their site, but
that means they are sharing a version of the image effectively, which
renders any attempt to protect the image with watermarks kind of silly.
For instance, take this image:
Loading Image...
It looks like it's 'protected'. But with a little searching it's easy to
find 'unprotected' versions.
Like here:
Loading Image...